# Cred/Grain Dynamics

**URL:** <https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/cred-grain-dynamics/277>\
**Category:** The CredSperiment\
**Created:** [October 7, 2019, 12:55am UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/cred-grain-dynamics/277 "2019-10-07T00:55:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![burrrata](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.sourcecred.io/burrrata/32/135_2.png) [@burrrata](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/burrrata)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2019, 2:19am UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/cred-grain-dynamics/277/19 "2019-10-21T02:19:00Z")

</div>

Thinking about this more in the context of [boosting](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/sourcecred-boosting-a-prediction-market-on-ideas/306) and it’s really too bad that we don’t have that system set up. Almost makes me want to wait to do documentation work (and really everything) until after it’s setup, otherwise I’ll totally miss out lol

That being said, that would be boring. The main “perk” or SourceCred is that it’s fun so def not going to do that. Interesting to think about, however, because incentives should be directly correlated to value creation, not just timing and/or what happens to be getting measured and managed (at least in a perfect world…).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/cred-grain-dynamics/277)._