# Imagining new Discord Props Experiences

**URL:** <https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/imagining-new-discord-props-experiences/1035>\
**Category:** The CredSperiment\
**Created:** [January 20, 2021, 8:08pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/imagining-new-discord-props-experiences/1035 "2021-01-20T20:08:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![benoxmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ea666f/32.png) [@benoxmo](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/benoxmo)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2021, 10:16am UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/imagining-new-discord-props-experiences/1035/12 "2021-01-29T10:16:18Z")

</div>

I really like this discussion about going more granular with the props channel. It also echoes a [good point](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/the-shadow-of-sourcecred/1044) made by @eeli on having better metrics to assess cred policy changes.

The format for the prop message would be :

- the text : _props to blueridger & metadreamer for the ideas brought up_

- a category emoji in relation with the work: 🤖 or 💝 or …

- confidence emojis

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/imagining-new-discord-props-experiences/1035)._