# Productivity / Quality of Life for instance maintainers

**URL:** <https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/productivity-quality-of-life-for-instance-maintainers/651>\
**Category:** Initiatives\
**Created:** [February 28, 2020, 4:50pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/productivity-quality-of-life-for-instance-maintainers/651 "2020-02-28T16:50:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beanow](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.sourcecred.io/beanow/32/98_2.png) [@Beanow](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/Beanow)\
**Post date:** [February 29, 2020, 1:53pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/productivity-quality-of-life-for-instance-maintainers/651/3 "2020-02-29T13:53:18Z")

</div>

Taking from [Refactoring the load system - #11 by Beanow](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/refactoring-the-load-system/629/11)

> [@Refactoring the load system](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/refactoring-the-load-system/629/11):
>
> Possibly some of these points will be included in [Productivity / Quality of Life release](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/productivity-quality-of-life-release/651). However:
> 
> > This initiative is to **save time and make it easier** to maintain a SourceCred instance.
> 
> I’ve deliberately not included **easier / time saving for developers** here. So if these further refactors are time consuming and don’t help instance maintainers much, I’m inclined to punt on it for a while.

@decentralion do you think this scope distinction of **instance maintainer vs developer ease** makes sense?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/productivity-quality-of-life-for-instance-maintainers/651)._