# \[Resource Allocation\] Premium/Tiered Tech Support for Instances

**URL:** https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/resource-allocation-premium-tiered-tech-support-for-instances/1157
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [May 28, 2021, 10:27pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/resource-allocation-premium-tiered-tech-support-for-instances/1157 "2021-05-28T22:27:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scrabbleboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8c91f0/32.png) [@scrabbleboy](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/scrabbleboy)
#### Post date: [May 28, 2021, 10:27pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/resource-allocation-premium-tiered-tech-support-for-instances/1157/1 "2021-05-28T22:27:12Z")

</div>

Summary: As SourceCred prepares to scale to more communities, we need to allocate resources in alignment with this growth trajectory. A highly constrained resource is Senior Developer time, This initiative will attempt to judiciously allocate this resource, starting with tech-support.

Premise:

- Currently the SourceCred Discord only has 1, non-permissioned #tech-support channel, no context other than the issue and the Discord ID of the requester.
  - Without distinction between tech-support issues or permissioned users, the tech-support load can get very resource-intensive.

- Senior Devs at SC currently handle all tech-support questions with high priority
  - This negatively impacts progress on their priorities and in turn product, which is an area of focus SC needs to progress toward self-sustenance (we distribute grain from ecosystems revenue and other internal funds)

Goal:

- Give devs time back in their day to work on their priorities.
- Give prioritized and premium support to live instances who currently support us through tithing/revenue
  - Service Level Agreements (SLAs) – TBD /Elevated levels of support

Proposal:

- **Two** discord channels for SC tech-support
  - A non-permissioned general tech-support channel for general public and prospective DAO/communities to get support
    - Mints lower cred than premium tech-support channel

  - A permissioned premium tech-support channel for partner communities who support SC through tithing/tevenue
    - Only permissioned users from tithing/revenue supportive communities can access this channel
    - Mints higher cred than premium tech-support
    - SLA TBD

Thoughts welcome, to be ratified and implemented in the next few (working) weeks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![AL0YSI0US](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.sourcecred.io/al0ysi0us/32/1282_2.png) [@AL0YSI0US](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/AL0YSI0US)
#### Post date: [May 29, 2021, 11:35pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/resource-allocation-premium-tiered-tech-support-for-instances/1157/2 "2021-05-29T23:35:24Z")

</div>

> [@scrabbleboy](#):
>
> Proposal:
> 
> - **Two** discord channels for SC tech-support
> - A non-permissioned general tech-support channel for general public and prospective DAO/communities to get support
> - Mints lower cred than premium tech-support channel
> 
> - A permissioned premium tech-support channel for partner communities who support SC through tithing/tevenue
> - Only permissioned users from tithing/revenue supportive communities can access this channel
> - Mints higher cred than premium tech-support
> - SLA TBD

![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/uploads/sourcecred1/original/2X/b/b5b3b9dea813372e760e491f7dbd76464246b311.gif)

```auto
This is great! I'm exploring some possibilities of what 
that could look like within the server . . . 

```

### Say our server reflected the following:

1. Rename :👷tech-support as it is now to​👷internal-tech-support (🤷🏾‍♂️)

> Perhaps this channel is a permission-only channel for our internal team, and not just devs so that teams can still collaborate.
> 
> I think permissions would be good because a user without permissions for that channel would see a message that says you do not have permissions to post here and we could pin a message to the top which redirects to the `Co-communities tech support` dropdown

This will slow down the traffic this chat is seeing while questions begin to flow to other tech support channels. I imagine it being our internal chat for our devs.

I offer the rename first because I do not know if you can move a whole channel and keep its content. I imagine others might have some insight/ ideas.

Create a New Dropdown for `Co-communities tech support` which includes:

(each co-community & tithing/revenue has its own channel within the dropdown)

- 🐙 meta-game-ts

- 🏦 maker-dao-ts

- 🤖 gitcoin-ts

- 🐝 1hive-ts

- 💱 tithing-ts (secured channel, weighted differently than the others)

Curious what folx thoughts are on the aesthetic changes to the server…where we move things what they look like.

I like to keep in mind accessibility and find @KuraFire’s input would be great to have in the loop as we look to make changes to the visual landscape of our server.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scrabbleboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8c91f0/32.png) [@scrabbleboy](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/scrabbleboy)
#### Post date: [May 31, 2021, 5:00pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/resource-allocation-premium-tiered-tech-support-for-instances/1157/3 "2021-05-31T17:00:11Z")

</div>

Yes, I like this. I think support routing done in the way you’ve described would work well at this stage of scaling. Further down the line as we absolutely come to a limit (if ever), we can look into a supporting routing/ticketing system, but as it stands this method will both give devs back time AND encourage community participation for general tech support resolution, which allows for a decentralized process.
