# SourceCred governance

**URL:** <https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/sourcecred-governance/130>\
**Category:** Research\
**Created:** [July 19, 2019, 8:46am UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/sourcecred-governance/130 "2019-07-19T08:46:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![decentralion](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.sourcecred.io/decentralion/32/7_2.png) [@decentralion](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/decentralion)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2019, 9:40pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/sourcecred-governance/130/7 "2019-08-12T21:40:56Z")

</div>

Cool, thanks for the info @burrrata. We’re agreed on the conclusion that setting up a SC DAO is premature at this point. But let’s definitely keep in touch about it. I like Aragon’s vision a lot and I think our projects are well aligned. (It would be great to meet up with you or other Aragon folks in person – I’m in Berlin all of August, and then will be in Valencia for most of September, if that’s convenient at all.)

Regarding the nest grant: Once we are confident in SourceCred’s ability to rewards people effectively (based on our [dogfooding](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/dogfooding-sourcecred-via-opencollective/134)), we could set up a cred instance that’s focused specifically on an Aragon-SC integration, and then pay the nest grant out to contributors according to cred (with the ANT tokens being distributed by the finished DAO). It would be another great dogfooding experiment!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/sourcecred-governance/130)._