# WIsh List Categorization

**URL:** <https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/wish-list-categorization/564>\
**Category:** Site Feedback\
**Created:** [January 3, 2020, 5:11pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/wish-list-categorization/564 "2020-01-03T17:11:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![decentralion](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.sourcecred.io/decentralion/32/7_2.png) [@decentralion](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/u/decentralion)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2020, 10:19pm UTC](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/wish-list-categorization/564/6 "2020-01-03T22:19:25Z")

</div>

> [@Beanow](#):
>
> Anyway, if I need to come up with a category, I would say it’s one example of [Spontanious Community Call](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/spontanious-community-call/543) 's review culture. So the forum equivalent of a PR? A RFC?

👍I really want to shift to using a review-based approach for configuring the call. I think that the [GitHub label proposal](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/proposal-add-github-pr-labels/555) is a good example of this.

I agree we should come up with a process for doing this. Maybe on the “Site Feedback” category we can have a process for RFCs to change the way the forum is organized?

To try this out, I posted a [RFC for changing the top bar links](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/rfc-renaming-the-top-bar-links/568)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/wish-list-categorization/564)._
