It’s definitely interesting. Some limitations also stand out to me.
@Protocol at 0.6%, seems like a measurement problem. Being mostly invisible in the value they’re adding having only a Grain stake.
@mzargham at 2.8% seems low in certain contexts. In part this shows the raw activity bias, but also hints at what this metric might be useful as. I would argue this is a proxy for skin in the game, not as a predictor of who’s likely able to make an informed vote.
For a question like: do we want to spend more resources on X? The skin in game measurement seems great. For a question like: should we adopt this proposed new algorithm? I think it fails to recognize who could be domain experts.