Artifacts

[burrrata]

Description

---

An Artifact for Artifacts. So meta!

The Artifacts Artifact allows us to easily give credit to all the contributions that make Artifacts possible.

Contributions

---

Initiatives

Description Initiatives provide a framework to plan, execute, and attribute Cred to work that adds value to SourceCred. Initiatives make it easy for the community to keep all the information on a project in one place. Then via the Champions, References. and Contributions categories it’s easy to flow Cred to the appropriate nodes. Contributions https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/initiatives-template-discussion/445 https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/initiatives-template/455 https://discourse…

Artifacts Template

I think we can skip the “Artifact ##” prefixes, similar to Initiatives. Name: Can use the title for this. Description: Add a bit of context here. Benefits: Would be what you meant with the purpose part. This is what we use for initiatives. References: Also similar to initiatives.

References

---

https://discourse.sourcecred.io/t/about-the-artifacts-category/253

Supernodes: Moving past raw activity

So far, SourceCred has tracked contributions at the level of raw activity. Here are some examples of activities we track: GitHub pull requests GitHub comments GitHub Reactions Discourse posts Discourse likes The activity data has been a great starting point. Activity data is easy to collect automatically, so we can get a reasonable baseline for cred scores. However, using activity data alone has serious issues. Valuing any individual piece of activity can be quite hard, and the activity data…